|
Court to Decide U.S.-Cuba Cohiba Dispute
New York - Legal ownership of the Cohiba brand in the U.S.
will be decided in a New York courtroom, following a trademark
infringement lawsuit brought by state-owned Empresa Cubana
del Tabaco (Cubatabaco) against New York-based General Cigar
Holdings Inc.
Nick Simeonidis, senior vice-president and general counsel
for General Cigar, said the case was originally supposed
to be heard last October, but it’s been delayed and
isn’t likely to come to trial until April .
Both sides had moved for summary judgement since no material
issues of fact were in dispute, but that motion was denied
last summer by Judge Robert Sweet of the Southern District
of New York.
“In sum, we’re arguing that we own the trademark,”
said Simeonidis in a phone interview. “Cubatabaco
knew about this for years and years, and didn’t do
anything about it until very late - too late in fact.”
The Cohiba brand, created in 1965 by Che Guevara, was the
first cigar brand established by the Castro government following
the 1959 revolution. A super-premium cigar for Castro’s
private use, it was given out to heads of state and other
VIPs. Thanks to their relative scarcity, Cohibas attained
a cult status among cigar lovers and, by the early 1970s,
were on sale in some Cuban cigar shops. In 1982, Cuba began
exporting Cohibas to Europe, where they were an instant
hit.
General Cigar first registered the Cohiba name in the United
States in 1978, and since the 1980s has been making Cohibas
at its factory in the Dominican Republic. The popular “red
dot” Cohiba was introduced in 1997.
“Cohiba is now a very well-known brand for General
Cigar,” Simeonidis told Smokeshop.
In February 1997, Cuba attempted to cancel General’s
trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, but
suspended that action when it sued Culbro Corp., the former
parent of General Cigar, later that year, accusing Culbro
of trademark infringement and false designation of source
of origin, among other allegations. In January 1998, the
parties agreed to attempt to settle out of court.
But in 2001, Judge Sweet found that General Cigar’s
first registration of the Cohiba trademark had been abandoned
in the 1980s, and that the case should be resolved on the
basis of its second registration in 1992.
The judge also dismissed Cubatabaco’s claims of ownership
to the trademark based upon two intellectual property treaties.
“Cubatabaco is trying to make the claim that somehow
our registration should be cancelled,” said Simeonidis.
“If that were the case, then no one would be able
to sell a Cohiba in the U.S. But we don’t think that
will happen.”
- Luxner
|